Cannabis Business

Our firm focuses on helping entrepreneurs in this emerging industry.  Our clients include investors and clients setting up entities, developing business plans and design patents, trademarking brands, and taking steps to participate in the growing cannabis industry.  Subscribe to our youtube channel to stay up to date on the state of the industry with Walker Chandler.

Below is the Legal Update from Walker Chandler regarding the state of the industry in Georgia presently


Past, Present, and Future


I am writing this short paper in May of 2016.  It is provided for the purpose of  education, planning, and warning to the friends  and clients of the Chandler and Chandler Law Group of Atlanta, Georgia.  For the purposes of this account,  the term  cannabis will be used and will refer in a general way to both major strains of that plant, ie: sativ and indica.  Also note that the term THC   refers to the main psychoactive ingredient that  is  found among the numerous and  complex  compounds found in cannabis.

The Past

It is not necessary to repeat here the long, sad, and almost-incredible history of cannabis  prohibition in the United States in general and Georgia in particular.  Such a general history may be found at
As a passing note for those unfamiliar with the plant,  it is also known as hemp and has been a source of food, fiber, and medicine for thousands of years.

Georgia  did not specifically make cannabis  illegal  prior to 1935.  As I often point out in public talks,  it was made illegal by an all-white, all male, largely liquor-drinking General Assembly completely controlled by the Democrat Party.  Those men didn’t know what they were  doing and didn’t care.  Since then several generations of legislators who could have, should have, and often did  know better have come and gone.  The prohibition  of marijuana  in Georgia has resulted in the abuse, humiliation, impoverishment, and imprisonment of hundreds of thousands of Georgians  during the  ensuing  71 years.  It also resulted in  many years of propaganda and fear-mongering  in the  educational systems of  the state, and thereby “trained” the voters to support only those who proposed harsh penalties  on those who possessed, grew, sold, or even gave away cannabis.

When so-called marijuana  [ the Mexican name for the plant] began being popular  among white, middle-class, college-age young people in the late  1960’s,  the General Assembly reduced  the possession of less than an ounce to be a misdemeanor rather than a felony as had been the case previously.  A misdemeanor conviction could still result in  up to a year in jail and up to a $1,000 fine.

In an additional act of cruelty, the  General Assembly also passed laws that revoked drivers’’ licenses for those convicted of simple or felony possession even if such possession was entirely unrelated to driving vehicles.  That law was rescinded only recently.

In approximately 1983 when it became clear that there were at least a few medical uses for  cannabis,  Georgia passed its first medical marijuana law, but provided no means whereby the medical community could do anything with it.

Federally, notwithstanding  a long history of medical use of cannabis,  cannabis was arbitrarily scheduled  as a  Schedule I drug with “no medical use”.  That long-standing, unscientific and politically-driven scheduling is  at long last under reconsideration, perhaps due in part to the president being a former marijuana user and (probably) dealer himself when he lived in  Hawaii.

In the mid 1990’s Georgia began letting  municipalities handle misdemeanor marijuana cases—something  which I consider simply a way of giving them licences to steal money from hapless victims of this wicked, modern Prohibition which those  elected officials who know better should have taken steps to dismantle.  Of course,  that would have taken courage and leadership.

In 1990  Georgia passed a law to drug-test  state employees.  That law was struck down as violative of the 4th Amendment by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in 1993.

At the same time as the 1990 law was passed, Georgia also passed a law saying that  candidates for public office  would have to pass drug tests  ( but not intelligence or ethics tests) in order to appear on election ballots.  The Libertarian Party of Georgia  formally objected to that law,  and in 1994 three of its candidates for statewide office filed suit against that law in federal court.

I was  the lead plaintiff and brought the case on  4th  Amendment, search-and-seizure grounds as well as  First  Amendment grounds.  In my opinion, the law was what I called  a William Tell law,  wherein candidates were being required to take off their hats to the hoisted symbol of  drug war on the government’s  pole.

We lost in the District Court, and got a 2-1 unfavorable decision in the 11th Circuit . I asked the United States Supreme Court to hear the case .  They agreed that it was a vital issue to con.  I argued the case myself.  The Court agreed with me and  by an 8-1 decision held  on the 4th Amendment grounds that the candidate drug-testing law was unconstitutional.  The Court did not reach the 1st Amendment issue.

In recent years some of the members of the General Assembly have realized that the mess begun in 1935 needs to be undone,  but of course, few  of them are willing to lose an election doing what is morally right.

The Present

During the last two sessions of the General Assembly the issue of medical use of marijuana has been studied and re-studied and discussed  almost endlessly by elected officials am members of the state government  charged with matters of public health.

Throughout these processes the Georgia Department of Public Health is forward-looking.  It has been studying what is being done in Colorado.   It has already promulgated in its Rules its CHAPTER 511-5-11,  a LOW THC OIL PATIENT REGISTRY.

Opposition, of course,  is predictable and loud from the law enforcement, probation, incarceration, and drug-testing industries who  back up the  those  who believe  one of the purposes of government  is to regulate and control  the common people.

BUT,  the tipping point has been reached.  Several states and the District of Columbia—the nation’s capitol—have legalized  not only medical use of cannabis ,  but also Adult Use.  And the skies of Washington and those of the states of Washington and Colorado have not fallen.

ALSO,   polls show that not only does a majority of Georgians want medical marijuana made legal in this state,  but also it wants Adult Use to be legal.  That majority is going to grow.  And where the votes go, so too shall the politicians—either that or they will be voted out.

The Future

At Chandler and Chandler  we foresee that Georgia will soon have to consider each of the following issues and areas of regulation and empowerment. Our firm,  working with our friends and connections  in the private sector and government both here in Georgia and nationwide will be in a position to advise and help these transitions to more workable and benign systems arising from changing public policies.

Medical use:
The main stumbling-block to a system of permitted , regulated medical will be the licensing and regulation of supply.   There will undoubtedly  be many large concerns  that will be lobbying for a  limited, monopolistic pattern which will favor big companies and prohibit small-scale growing and production.  Such  a proposal was thought to be the main reason a vote on medical failed in Ohio earlier this year.

Undoubtedly there will be licensed , in-state production of cannabis from which medical products ( such as THC-rich CBD oils) will be derived.

Regulation will also concern the establishment  of a system of a limited number of dispensaries or may even  have  proposals to license only existing drugstores.  There will be much  backroom negotiations on this sort of issue.  A failure to agree in such back rooms may further delay passage despite the public clamor for change.

Regulation will also be formulated with respect to delivery methods, permissions, security,   taxation, and reliable potencies.  I suspect that the Department of Public Health will suggest the wholesale adoption of systems currently in place elsewhere in the United States but that lobbyists will be having a field day trying to  influence the various clients they represent—clients who will want to get  limited licenses and hamper  their competition.

Adult Use:

Many of the same issue discussed under Medical   Use  will apply to Adult Use.
The major questions that will arise will be centered around the right to grow cannabis on a small-scale basis for personal consumption.  Expect the lobbyists to fight that.


Another major area of future regulatory concern will be ( at least initially) , the licensing of  hemp as a field crop that will yield  fiber for paper, building materials and cloth,  seed for food and oil, among other uses.

I should think that the Farm Bureau  and  the state’s paper industries will soon fall in behind a drive for a hemp industry here in Georgia to feed our insatiable mills and bring to a merciful close  the current , shameful practices of clear-cutting wildlife habitat for the purposes of “biomass” power generation, paper making, and similar uses to which hemp is much more suitable.